AI Agents

An AI agent purpose-built for your industry that runs autonomously on domain-specific workflows.

What an agent engagement covers, how it runs, and what you hold at the end.

FIT

Whether this applies to you

BUILT FOR

  • One workflow runs many times a week and follows the same shape each time
  • Its decisions are real but bounded — someone could write the rules down
  • The systems it touches expose APIs, not only screens
  • Occasional errors are recoverable, and you would rather escalate than guess

NOT A FIT WHEN

  • Every case is different and the judgement is the product
  • Volume is low enough that a person clears it in minutes a week
  • Nobody can state the acceptance criteria for a correct outcome

SCOPE

Where the engagement's edges are

IN SCOPE

  • One named workflow, modelled intake to completion
  • Decision boundaries, confidence thresholds, and escalation rules
  • Integration adapters for the systems inside that workflow
  • A validation harness of production-representative cases
  • Monitoring, runbooks, and human override

OUT OF SCOPE

  • A second workflow — a separate scope, built on the same foundation
  • Replacing the systems the agent integrates with
  • Decisions your team has not agreed to delegate

WHAT WE NEED FROM YOU

  • A workflow owner who can adjudicate edge cases
  • API access to the systems in the loop
  • A sample of real past cases, including the awkward ones

DELIVERY

How the work runs

  1. Workflow mapping

    1 week

    Exit criterionThe workflow is modelled intake to completion, with the awkward cases named

  2. Boundary design

    3–5 days

    Exit criterionDecision boundaries, thresholds, and escalation rules are agreed in writing

  3. Build and integration

    2–3 weeks

    Exit criterionThe agent completes the standard path end to end against your systems

  4. Validation

    1 week

    Exit criterionProduction-representative cases pass, and every escalation path has been exercised

  5. Go-live and transfer

    3–5 days

    Exit criterionRunning with monitoring and override, and your team holds the runbook

Durations are indicative and firm up once mapping is done.

DELIVERABLES

What you are left holding

  • The running agent, wired into your stack
  • The workflow model, intake to completion
  • The decision-boundary specification — thresholds, escalations, fallbacks
  • A validation harness you can re-run after any change
  • Run-level traces for audit and reversal
  • Monitoring, runbooks, and a documented override procedure

SIGNALS

How you would tell it worked

  • Runs completed without a person

    Baseline
    Zero at go-live; measured weekly thereafter
    Success direction
    Up, with escalation quality held
  • Median intake-to-completion time

    Baseline
    The current manual path, timed across twenty cases
    Success direction
    Down
  • Escalation rate

    Baseline
    The first month of live running
    Success direction
    Down, then flat — a floor, not zero
  • Reversal rate

    Baseline
    Actions undone after the fact, counted from go-live
    Success direction
    Down, and close to zero
  • Coordination touches per case

    Baseline
    Handoffs counted in the current process
    Success direction
    Down

NEXT STEP

Describe your process and receive a proposal with next steps within 24 hours.

Start a Conversation