AI Agents
An AI agent purpose-built for your industry that runs autonomously on domain-specific workflows.
What an agent engagement covers, how it runs, and what you hold at the end.
FIT
Whether this applies to you
BUILT FOR
- One workflow runs many times a week and follows the same shape each time
- Its decisions are real but bounded — someone could write the rules down
- The systems it touches expose APIs, not only screens
- Occasional errors are recoverable, and you would rather escalate than guess
NOT A FIT WHEN
- Every case is different and the judgement is the product
- Volume is low enough that a person clears it in minutes a week
- Nobody can state the acceptance criteria for a correct outcome
SCOPE
Where the engagement's edges are
IN SCOPE
- One named workflow, modelled intake to completion
- Decision boundaries, confidence thresholds, and escalation rules
- Integration adapters for the systems inside that workflow
- A validation harness of production-representative cases
- Monitoring, runbooks, and human override
OUT OF SCOPE
- A second workflow — a separate scope, built on the same foundation
- Replacing the systems the agent integrates with
- Decisions your team has not agreed to delegate
WHAT WE NEED FROM YOU
- A workflow owner who can adjudicate edge cases
- API access to the systems in the loop
- A sample of real past cases, including the awkward ones
DELIVERY
How the work runs
Workflow mapping
The workflow is modelled intake to completion, with the awkward cases named
Boundary design
Decision boundaries, thresholds, and escalation rules are agreed in writing
Build and integration
The agent completes the standard path end to end against your systems
Validation
Production-representative cases pass, and every escalation path has been exercised
Go-live and transfer
Running with monitoring and override, and your team holds the runbook
DELIVERABLES
What you are left holding
- The running agent, wired into your stack
- The workflow model, intake to completion
- The decision-boundary specification — thresholds, escalations, fallbacks
- A validation harness you can re-run after any change
- Run-level traces for audit and reversal
- Monitoring, runbooks, and a documented override procedure
SIGNALS
How you would tell it worked
Runs completed without a person
- Zero at go-live; measured weekly thereafter
- Up, with escalation quality held
Median intake-to-completion time
- The current manual path, timed across twenty cases
- Down
Escalation rate
- The first month of live running
- Down, then flat — a floor, not zero
Reversal rate
- Actions undone after the fact, counted from go-live
- Down, and close to zero
Coordination touches per case
- Handoffs counted in the current process
- Down
NEXT STEP
Describe your process and receive a proposal with next steps within 24 hours.
Start a Conversation